Monthly Archives: June 2013

NSA Spying: Obama says he’s really, really not spying on us.

By Christopher B. Daly

Turns out, Obama is sorry about the fact that we think he is secretly spying on innocent Americans. He’s sorry he has been doing it since he took office. He’s sorry that he kept it a secret from us. He’s so sorry that now he welcomes a public imgresdebate about routinely spying, in peacetime, on millions of Americans not even suspected of a crime. According to a story in today’s NYTimes, Obama is so sorry about secretly spying on innocent Americans that he mentions it every chance he gets. Whenever a crowd gathers, he attempts to reassure us that he is not secretly spying on innocent Americans.

Just one thing: he’s not so sorry about secretly spying on innocent Americans that he will actually stop doing it. Even though he could give the order before lunch and end it immediately. No, he’s not that sorry. He’s also not so sorry that he  will actually stop secretly spying on innocent Americans.

Anybody confused?

Here’s Obama:

“The American people don’t have a Big Brother who is snooping into their business. . .I’m confident of that. But I want to make sure everybody is confident of that.”

Well, there is one thing you could do: stop spying on us.

Then, we could have that debate about whether it is a good idea for the government to be secretly spying on innocent Americans.


Leave a comment

Filed under Uncategorized

Who will own the Boston Globe?

An update on the bidding for the Boston Globe (and other properties being sold by the New York Times Co.).

The deadline for bidding was yesterday. The Globe itself reports that there were at least six bids submitted — including one that I did not preview in my earlier post: Red Sox co-owner John Henry and his Fenway Sports Group. (Wow — could the Globe pay any more attention to the Sox than they do now?)

According to the Globe, the Kraft group dropped out of the bidding, which means the region’s newspaper will not be owned by the region’s NFL franchise owner. Phew.

Here’s the Reuters version.

Stay tuned.


Filed under media, New York Times, publishing

It’s raining leaks!

By Christopher B. Daly 

imgres3Today’s news brings a very curious twist on the theme of national-security leaks. This time, the suspected leaker is not a low-level functionary like Bradley Manning or Edward Snowden but a high-ranking military official — in fact, the former No. 2 in the entire military command structure. According to a report first broken by NBC News, retired Marine Gen. James E. “Hoss” Cartwright is under investigation in connection with the leak of classified information about American cyberattacks against Iran, intended to disable or slow down Iran’s program to build a nuclear weapon. (The coverage in today’s NYTimes is rather circumspect, which makes sense, considering that the Times was the recipient of the leak. The paper quotes NYT executive editor Jill Abramson saying she doesn’t discuss such things.)

I wonder if Cartwright’s rank will make any difference here. After all, he’s not some some “29-year-old hacker,” — as President Obama pooh-poohed Snowden on Thursday, while adroitly trying to keep the Snowden/NSA leak from screwing up great-power relations with China and Russia. (Funny thing: at other times, Obama is quite willing to characterize Snowden as a threat to our very existence. Also, an update: Snowden turned 30 last week.)

Back to Cartwright. Far from being a hacker, Cartwright, who was named vice chairman of the Joint Chiefs by President28stuxnet1-img-articleInline Bush and who served under Obama as well, was at the epicenter of the military/national security power structure. I wonder how the top brass and the national-security establishment feel about leaks now, when one apparently came from one of their own. Where’s the outrage? Will we be seeing Sens. McCain and Graham or former veep Cheney going on Sunday TV talk shows demanding his head?

We might also ask: Why would Hoss Cartwright do such a thing? He’s not commenting, but we can just imagine. Maybe he wanted to see the U.S. get credit for “doing something” about the Iranian threat. Maybe he wanted to let Americans know that we had the technical means to mess up their weapons program without having to attack or invade Iran by conventional means. Maybe he was ordered to make the leak by someone who out-ranked him (perhaps the Chair of the Joint Chiefs, or the National Security Adviser, or the Secretary of Defense, or the President himself?)

The Washington Post, after pointing out that the cyberattack on Iran included a computer virus named Stuxnet and was part of a broader program code-named “Olympic Games,” adds this tantalizing hint:

Cartwright, who helped launch that campaign under President Bush and pushed for its escalation under Obama. . .

Maybe Cartwright thought his favored program was threatened in some way by someone else in the national security apparatus.

As I have long maintained, the reaction to leaking is very much in the eye of the beholder. If the leaker is powerful enough, the act of leaking is not a crime but just politics by another means.

For the record: As far as we know, Cartwright would be the eighth target of an Espionage Act investigation undertaken in the Obama administration’s record-breaking campaign to punish leakers.

Speaking of cyberattacks, U.S. officials seems to be scrambling to find a path through this 28cyber1-img-popuppolicy thicket. On the one hand, Joint Chiefs Chairman Martin Dempsey is hurrying to write new rules for warfare in cyberspace, according to another article in today’s NYTimes. (Don’t hold your breath waiting to participate in this process yourself: any such rules are classified. So there!) Here’s the takeaway:

[Dempsey] said that, globally, new regulations were needed to govern actions by the world community in cyberspace. He said that the Chinese did not believe that hacking American systems violated any rules, since no rules existed.

And, finally, for an example of what’s at stake in terms of commerce, today’s Boston Globe has an eye-popping story about how the Chinese allegedly steal commercial secrets. If you thought they just stole plans for making plastic tschotschkes, think again. This one involved the design for wind turbines, which the Chinese had the nerve to sell back to us!

It’s enough to make the head spin. How am I supposed to keep up with the Whitey Bulger trial, the Hernandez case, or the trade of both Paul Pierce and Kevin Garnett to the Brooklyn Nets????

p.s. For a fun and puzzling exercise in mind-games, go to the NYT homepage and enter the term “stuxnet” in the search box. If you can figure out the results, please explain in a comment below. 

1 Comment

Filed under Journalism, journalism history, leaks, media, New York Times, Obama, Politics, President Obama, Wikileaks

Monday morning roundup

Odds & Ends:

–Here’s David Carr on the “British invasion” of the high end of American media. (Why don’t they ever try to take our unpaid internships and crummy starting jobs?)

–Here’s the Times’ attempt to keep with Edward Snowden. What I found remarkable about this story — which was, after all, quite inconclusive — was the combined throw-weight of the team of reporters. In addition to the triple byline, I count seven more bylines in the credit line at the bottom. That’s 10 reporters on three continents, not to mention interns, news aides, editors, photographers, and photo editors. Take that, HuffPo!

–Here’s a Times feature on the antiquated ways of SCOTUS. These are not merely quaint. I believe they are snubbing their noses at all the rest of us, because they can. They are among the most unaccountable holders of power in the country. Perhaps an occasional impeachment (yes, it can be done and has been) would get their attention.





Filed under Uncategorized

Why I hate fishing

By Christopher B. Daly

Actually, this is just one reason: Many people who fish (not all, granted) leave a lot of junk behind.

I recently found this attractive nuisance on the ground near Crystal Lake in Newton, Mass. — just seconds before my puppy found it and did what she does with everything, which is to say, tried to eat it. 


Leave a comment

Filed under Uncategorized

Who will own the Boston Globe?

By Christopher B. Daly 

The New York Times Co. has declared its intention (again) to sell the Boston Globe and has solicited bids. They are due on June 27. Since the Globe employs the largest team of journalists in New England, the outcome of that process is of interest to every resident of the region.

So, as a public service, here is a handicapping of the field of bidders. (the Globe itself identified eight potential buyers — both individuals and groups — but reported today that the “Kraft group” has dropped out. Perhaps Robert Kraft is too busy overseeing his wayward football players or squiring his babe/girlfriend to charity events?)

Note: As the estimable blogger/professor Dan Kennedy has pointed out, the Globe sale includes not just the business but some pretty significant tangible assets, including a big chunk of property in Dorchester that is ripe for development into something more attractive than the uber-utilitarian Globe building, plus what is probably the biggest array of printing presses in New England, not to mention a fleet of boxy green trucks.

The field:


–The Comeback Kids: Two members of the Taylor family, which founded the Globe in 1873 and ran it until 1993, are interested. Cousins Ben and Steve Taylor have teamed up with former magazine executive Jack Griffin. For the Taylors, this would be a way to recycle some of the vast pile of money they took from the Sulzberger family when the Times Co. overpaid for bought the Globe from the Taylors for $1.1 billion. It would fascinating to know what the Taylors have done with that $1.1 billion over the last 20 years. If they had invested it in the Dow Jones Industrials, their haul would be worth about $4.5 billion today. So, they could easily afford to buy back the Globe at its steeply discounted current value. Estimates vary wildly, but it’s hard to imagine it could bring in $200 million. FYI, Griffin was a heavy-hitter in the magazine business: he was a top exec at Conde Nast, Meredith, and TIME Inc. until he set up a magazine consulting company, Empirical Media. He made an earlier play for the Globe with Aaron Kushner, but Kushner appears to have no role in this round of bidding.

–Rick Daniels, is a former president of the Boston Globe Co. (2001-2006). A Cohasset resident and B.U. alum, Daniels was an executive with GateHouse Media, which publishes the Patriot Ledger, the Brockton Enterprise, and the MetroWest newspaper, from 2007 to 2012. He is teamed with Heb Ryan of Boston Post Partners LLC, a private equity firm with an insanely discreet website. (Eds: Heb is cq; his full name is Heberden.)

John J. Gormally Jr., president of Gormally Broadcasting LLC in Springfield. Gormally owns an ABC affiliate WGGB-TV and a Fox affiliate, and it publishes BusinessWest , which calls itself “The Business Journal of Western Massachusetts.”

–Shannon Liss-Riordan, a Boston labor attorney at Lichten & Liss-Riordan, who call themselves “The Labor, Employment & Class Action Specialists” — which should serve Liss-Riordan in sorting out the Globe’s famously contentious and expensive labor agreements. A 1996 Harvard Law School grad, she has made a career of sticking up for the little guy, representing thousands of waiters and waitresses in forcing their employers to fork over their  tips — including a big 2006 jury verdict in a case against Hilltop Steak House. Unclear where she would round up the necessary millions.



–Robert Loring, founder and managing partner of Revolution Capital Group, which is based in Los Angeles. Loring, 48, a B.C. grad, was involved in the deal in which Revolution Capital bought the Tampa Tribune last year and bought the Clearwater (Fla.) Gazette two months ago. Since they are in the money business and sometimes in the newspaper-buying business, this seems like a plausible bidder.

–Jahm Najafi, another founder of another private equity firm, this one based in Phoenix. Nafafi, a Harvard Business School grad, is an owner of the Phoenix Suns but no newspapers. The closest thing to a newspaper is a publication we have all looked at: SkyMall.

–Douglas F. Manchester, a conservative businessman from Southern California, was a key donor in the campaign to ban gay marriage in California. “Papa Doug” has had a long career of running lots of companies, including the merged daily newspapers serving San Diego, the Union and the Tribune, which he inelegantly re-named the “U-T.” This is small, but I gotta say, he seems very un-Boston.

0   0   0   0   0   0

Overall, it’s disappointing that there aren’t more local bidders and that there are zero minority applicants. 




Filed under Uncategorized

Abolish the NCAA (Cont.)

By Christopher B. Daly

Here we go again. More evidence that the NCAA lacks a meaningful educational purpose and really operates as a professional sports league for the big sports. A federal judge is weighing whether to let all former NCAA athletes to join together to file a class-action lawsuit against the NCAA, demanding a share of the Association’s “profits.”

Here’s Fortune’s story.

Here’s Deadspin.


1 Comment

Filed under Uncategorized