By Christopher B. Daly
Unlike some people, I enjoyed Ken Auletta’s recent piece in the New Yorker, which was ostensibly about Hilary Clinton’s problems with the news media. (Yes, Fox and the like: she has her problems with reporters, too.) I don’t know whether is right about her media problems, and frankly, this far out from the election, I don’t give a hoot.
What I enjoyed in his piece was his swerve into the history of right-wing media and his documenting of what I call “the Meme Factory” — that interlocking directorate of conservative media, think tanks, and other institutions built since WWII with huge donations from the right. Auletta delves into the doings of Matthew Continetti — who is something of a third-generation of conservatives who have been building a parallel set of media institutions. (Continetti was mentored by Bill Kristol, who is, in turn, a direct descendant of one of the major builders of conservative media and think tanks of the 20th century, Irving Kristol.) Continetti founded a non-profit news operation called the Washington Free Beacon. (It’s like a normal DC-focused news website, but every article serves a conservative purpose.)
Hillary Clinton once famously complained that she and her husband were the targets of a “vast right-wing conspiracy.” That’s only half-true. There is a vast (and growing) network of right-wing institutions that are mutually reinforcing. Their existence is no accident. But it is a touch paranoid to refer to all those people and institutions as a “conspiracy.” They do not need to conspire to carry out their mission.
Clinton is also wide of the mark in another sense. While it is true that all of the people on the right hate her and her husband and strive unceasingly to destroy them, it is not true that they are her only problem. If Scaife and Murdoch and Limbaugh and the whole gang were to suddenly vanish, Hillary Clinton would not enjoy the glide into the White House that she may envision.
Prof Chris Daly's Blog 
Very accurate.
Hillary using a playbook later followed by Sarah Palin, creates a picture of herself as a victim of a press conspiracy while enjoying a remarkable immunity from one side of the press spectrum asking obvious tough questions.
No moderate or leftist columnist has questioned what she knew about drones and the NSA; what exactly she accomplished at State or what she did, if anything to encourage Guantanamo being closed. Similarly, she is given points for Bill’s successes, without ever being asked about her role in his failures, such as the Marc Rich scandal or his foundation’s finances.
LikeLike