Category Archives: Uncategorized

Watching the media-watchers

By Chris Daly

I love the weekly NPR program “On the Media,” but I suppose even media-watchers need watching. I was disappointed by this past weekend’s segment about Mormons. My sense is that Brooke Gladstone prepared for that piece as if she were interviewing an expert when in fact she was interviewing an advocate. Ron Wilson, who was identified as a “senior manager for Internet and advertising,” was a flat-out advocate, well-prepared with claims, assertions, and soothing mis-directions.

One of the most glaring: Early in the exchange, Mr. Wilson asserted that Mormonism is “the fourth-largest church” in America. That is a deeply misleading statement, which suggests that Mormonism is a large part of American life. Nothing could be further from the truth, since 98.3% of Americans do not belong to it.

To begin with, Mr. Wilson did not define his terms. Clearly, he did not mean “church” in the sense of a building. He meant “church” more in the sense of a distinctive set of beliefs and practices.

For detailed, authoritative information about Americans’ beliefs and practices, there is no better source than the Pew Forum on Religion and Public Life. The Pew Forum conducts an annual “Religious Landscape Survey,” and the results are posted on the Pew website. (For another set of statistics, see the website Adherents.)

If we look at that data set, there are several ways to consider the findings.

First, though, we must consider how to relate Mormonism to other sets of belief and practices. Mormons like Mr. Wilson assert that “Mormons are Christians.” This is a proposition about which people disagree, but if we accept that assertion for the sake of argument, then Mormonism should be counted for these purposes as one denomination among dozens of Christian denominations in America. All told, Christians (including Catholics) make up a little over three-quarters of the adult U.S. population. In this analysis, they are followed by a category called “unaffiliated” (with 16.1%, including Atheists and Agnostics) and all Jewish branches combined (at 1.7%). I guess that if Mormons were trying to justify a claim of “fourth largest,” that is how they would have to do it: All Christians, non-believers, Jews, Mormons. But that would fly in the face of their assertion to be Christians. We know they are not Catholics, so they must be some other kind of Christian. Lets look at other Christians.

Most non-Catholic Christians are Protestants of one kind or another. Among Protestant denominations, the Pew survey makes distinctions between Evangelical Protestant Churches, Mainline Protestant Churches, and Historically Black Churches. Combined, incidentally, those groupings add up to 51.3% of the U.S. adult population.

So, in one sense, it would be accurate to say that a little more than half of Americans are Protestants, about a quarter are Catholics, and a big chunk of the rest are unaffiliated.

Another way to look at the data, of course, (which Pew does not do, probably to keep people from getting mad at them) would be to rank each measurable group of people who share a distinctive set of practices and beliefs. If we do that, the U.S. religious landscape looks quite different. It looks like this:

–23.9% Catholics

–16.1% Unaffiliated, including Atheist and Agnostic (see below)

–10.8% Baptist (evangelical)

–5.4% Methodist

–4.4% Baptist (in the black tradition)

–3.4% “nondenominational evangelical”

–3.4% Pentacostal

–2.8% Lutheran

–2.5% “Other/Protestant nonspecific in the Mainline Tradition”

–1.9 % “Protestant in the Evangelical Tradition”

–1.9% Baptist (non-evangelical)

–1.9% Presbyterian

In this way of looking at “churches,” Mormonism does not make it into the top 10 in America, even if we exclude the “unaffiliated,” which I think would be unfair.

One more point: looking at the details in the survey of Mormons, the Pew data indicate that a group known as “Mormon” makes up 1.7 percent of the U.S. adult population. But that grouping includes three sub-groups:

–1.6% Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints (the group that Wilson actually speaks for)

–<0.3% Community of Christ

–<0.3 Mormon, not further specified.

That leaves the LDS Church, the one that Republicans Mitt Romney and Jon Huntsman Jr. belong to, at 1.6 percent. Such a figure leaves them tied with those who are willing to tell a survey questioner that they are Atheist. It also leaves LDS a good ways behind those who are willing to say they are Agnostic, a group that includes 2.4% of Americans. Combined, the number of Atheists and Agnostics – probably an understated number – make up 4%, which is a much larger group than many Christian denominations (e.g., Church of Christ, Evangelical Holiness, Episcopalian, Congregationalist, Greek Orthodox, Russian Orthodox, Unitarians, etc.) and considerably larger than LDS.

So, to return to the original issue: in what sense can a “church” like LDS, which includes a sliver of the U.S. adult population, support a claim to be the “fourth largest church” in the country? In my judgment, that is just not a fact-based statement.

Leave a comment

Filed under Uncategorized

Not to be missed

The New Yorker has a terrific piece by Ken Auletta about the still-new executive editor at the New York Times, Jill Abramson. (Full disclosure dept: I have known Jill since we were college classmates; I like her; and I admire her professionally. And I think her voice is charming.)

Much as I enjoy Auletta, I thought this piece could have focused a little less on management issues and more on politics. So, I would say the definitive piece may still be waiting to be written.

Jill Abramson (and Scout)

Photo by Mark Ellen Mark

Leave a comment

Filed under Harvard, Journalism, New York Times, Uncategorized

Not to be missed

An intelligent discussion of sources (in baseball) brought to us by the good folks at Grantland.

 

 

Leave a comment

Filed under Boston, Journalism, Red Sox, Uncategorized

Jobs and Immigrants

In reading today’s NYTimes story/obit about Steve Jobs, I could not help noticing that his biological father was identified as a graduate student from Syria. Luckily, at the time, the U.S. did not treat foreigners as presumptive terrorists. Today, I think it is more likely than not that a graduate student from another country — especially perhaps Syria — would find it nearly impossible to remain in the U.S.
In that case, America loses.

Leave a comment

Filed under Apple, Uncategorized

Not to be missed

Here is a video from 1994 showing the staff of NBC’s Today Show (i.e. Katie Couric and the now all-but-forgotten Bryant Gumbel) wrestling with that new-fangled “internet” thingie and the meaning of @.

Hat-tip to Al Tompkins (via Bill McKeen).

 

 

Leave a comment

Filed under Uncategorized

What does NCAA stand for?

By Christopher B. Daly

The latest Atlantic (print edition) brings a major piece by historian Taylor Branch on the NCAA. Titled “The Shame of College Sports,” it shines a much-needed light on the NCAA and depicts it as a corrupt, self-serving institution.

It is piece that feels like a landmark in sports journalism and that feels like the core of a new book. If Branch is working on a book, I hope he will expand on this piece and pursue several related themes:

–Even when a NCAA program is behaving itself, what is the impact on those students who are on a varsity team? How many get injured? How many graduate? How many live in a bubble on-campus?

–Branch makes a good case for considering NCAA football and basketball as minor leagues for those professional sports. In that case, why not cut them adrift and make the NFL and the NBA pay the cost of maintaining these farm teams? Pay the kids who play on those teams.

–Is it time to abolish not only the NCAA but all intercollegiate sports? In pursuit of the ideal of mens sana in corpore sano, intercollegiate athletics is actually counter-productive. NCAA athletes make up a tiny proportion of the student body at most schools. (And too often, the NCAA athletes neglect their minds and over-exert their bodies.) What about everyone else? All students need exercise. They need access to places where they can work out — not to giant stadiums that are only used 8 or nine times a year, not to exclusive “weight rooms” dedicated to varsity athletes, and the like. I am all for athletics on campus, just not the expensive hoopla that arises from having one school compete against another school.

To be continued. . .

Leave a comment

Filed under Uncategorized

TIME magazine’s new “scrapbook”

By Chris Daly 

I can’t really make heads nor tails of TIME’s recent announcement, but the venerable news weekly seems to be trying to do something about its own history in journalism, by creating a new tumblr site. Check it out.

I wish them well. And I hope to figure out what they have in mind by watching it unfold. Meanwhile, you can always use the TIME archive. The archive is pretty good, but the articles appear in the backdrop of the current website, so they are all ripped from the context of the original issues in which they appeared. The results can be pretty disorienting, but still. . . it is free.

Leave a comment

Filed under Journalism, journalism history, Uncategorized

Judge v. journalists

There is an ominous ruling from a judge in Chicago that threatens all student journalists who work on investigations. Read about it here and here.

If that judge is right, where is the boundary between law and journalism?

Leave a comment

Filed under Journalism, Uncategorized

Youth will be served

By Chris Daly

The NYTimes spots (yet another) new trend: younger and younger correspondents hitting the presidential campaign trail.

Any why not? Covering presidential campaigns requires mainly stamina, energy, and curiosity. The place where experience counts is on the desk where the correspondents’ work is edited. By this time next year, we should have a good idea who has a strong desk and who doesn’t.

 

Leave a comment

Filed under Uncategorized

Leaks, cont.

By Chris Daly

Here is a reminder that when elected officials denounce “leaks” to the news media, what they are usually talking about are unauthorized leaks. Every elected official that I ever covered or researched used leaks when they considered them advantageous. When a leak occurred that proved disadvantageous, they usually denounced those disclosures as horrendous ethical breaches that threatened the integrity of government, blah, blah, blah…

In this case, there is an added bonus: seeing Cheney have to acknowledge that leaking is a tactic (not a matter of principle) and as a super-bonus, seeing Cheney out of the loop.

Plus, a hat-tip to Dave Ignatius.

 

 

3 Comments

Filed under Journalism, journalism history, leaks, Uncategorized